Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/17/2021 01:30 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Alaska Police Standards Council | |
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics | |
| HB3 | |
| HB57 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE
March 17, 2021
1:33 p.m.
DRAFT
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Matt Claman, Chair
Representative Liz Snyder, Vice Chair (via Teams video)
Representative Harriet Drummond
Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins
Representative David Eastman
Representative Christopher Kurka
Representative Sarah Vance
MEMBERS ABSENT
All members present
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
Alaska Police Standards Council
Gregory "Scott" Campbell - Palmer
Justin Dahl - Anchorage
Ed Mercer - Juneau
Jennifer Winkelman - Juneau
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
Select Committee on Legislative Ethics
Dennis "Skip" Cook - Fairbanks
Gerald "Jerry" McBeath - Fairbanks
- CONFIRMATION(S) ADVANCED
HOUSE BILL NO. 3
"An Act relating to the definition of 'disaster.'"
- MOVED CSHB 3(JUD) OUT OF COMMITTEE
HOUSE BILL NO. 57
"An Act relating to the budget reserve fund established under
art. IX, sec. 17(d), Constitution of the State of Alaska;
relating to money available for appropriation for purposes of
applying art. IX, sec. 17, Constitution of the State of Alaska;
and providing for an effective date."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 3
SHORT TITLE: DEFINITION OF "DISASTER": CYBERSECURITY
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOHNSON
02/18/21 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/8/21
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) STA, JUD
02/23/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
02/23/21 (H) Heard & Held
02/23/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
03/02/21 (H) STA AT 3:00 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/02/21 (H) Moved CSHB 3(STA) Out of Committee
03/02/21 (H) MINUTE(STA)
03/08/21 (H) STA RPT CS(STA) 1DP 1NR 5AM
03/08/21 (H) DP: KREISS-TOMKINS
03/08/21 (H) NR: TARR
03/08/21 (H) AM: CLAMAN, STORY, EASTMAN, VANCE,
KAUFMAN
03/10/21 (H) JUD AT 1:30 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/10/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/15/21 (H) JUD AT 1:30 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/15/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/17/21 (H) JUD AT 1:30 PM GRUENBERG 120
BILL: HB 57
SHORT TITLE: FUNDS SUBJECT TO CBR SWEEP PROVISION
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) JOSEPHSON
02/18/21 (H) PREFILE RELEASED 1/15/21
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) JUD, FIN
03/10/21 (H) JUD AT 1:30 PM GRUENBERG 120
03/10/21 (H) Scheduled but Not Heard
03/17/21 (H) JUD AT 1:30 PM GRUENBERG 120
WITNESS REGISTER
GREGORY "SCOTT" CAMPBELL, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Palmer, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Alaska Police
Standards Council.
JUSTIN DAHL, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Alaska Police
Standards Council.
ED MERCER, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Alaska Police
Standards Council.
JENNIFER WINKLEMAN, Appointee
Alaska Police Standards Council
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Alaska Police
Standards Council.
DENNIS "SKIP" COOK, Appointee
Select Committee on Legislative Ethics
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Select
Committee on Legislative Ethics.
GERALD "JERRY" MACBETH, Appointee
Select Committee on Legislative Ethics
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified as appointee to the Select
Committee on Legislative Ethics.
REPRESENTATIVE DELENA JOHNSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor of HB 3, offered feedback
regarding proposed amendments.
MARK BREUNIG, Chief Information Security Officer
State Security Office
Department of Administration
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Offered his opinion on Amendments 5 and 6
to CSHB 3(STA).
ELISE THORNBERG, Staff
Representative Andy Josephson
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented the sectional analysis for HB 57
on behalf of Representative Josephson, prime sponsor.
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented HB 57.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:33:17 PM
CHAIR MATT CLAMAN called the House Judiciary Standing Committee
meeting to order at 1:33 p.m. Representatives Eastman, Vance,
Drummond, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, Snyder (via Teams video), and
Claman were present at the call to order.
CHAIR CLAMAN stated that if a committee member is in the
Capitol, in his/her office participating "by Teams, with the
video running," then he/she will be allowed to participate as if
in the committee room. This means being allowed to vote to move
a bill out of committee and sign the committee report. The same
will not be allowed for a committee member participating from
outside the Capitol building; those members would be allowed to
ask questions, but not allowed to vote to move a bill out of
committee. Chair Claman said these are instructions from the
Speaker of the House that have been confirmed by Legislative
Legal Services. In response to Representative Eastman, he
clarified that he was making an announcement rather than
bringing up a topic for discussion.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S):
^ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL
ALASKA POLICE STANDARDS COUNCIL
1:35:25 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the first order of business would be
the confirmation hearing on the governor's appointees to the
Alaska Police Standards Council.
1:36:32 PM
GREGORY "SCOTT" CAMPBELL, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards
Council, offered his biographical information [on his resume in
the committee packet], including his 25 years as a police
officer and previous service on the Alaska Police Standards
Council. He expressed interest in maintaining the standards,
recruitment, background checks, and regulations that are the
responsibility of the council. In response to a question from
Chair Claman, he clarified that he is not currently serving on
the council.
1:37:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN noted those with homeschool diplomas are
facing obstacles when seeking to work in law enforcement. He
asked Mr. Campbell for his thoughts on the issue.
MR. CAMPBELL answered that that is the first time he has heard
of that issue, and he thinks there should be no obstacles in
that regard.
CHAIR CLAMAN expressed that this seems to be a policy issue for
the legislature rather than a topic to broach with the
appointee.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN explained the policy had been instituted
by the council; therefore, he expressed his desire for the
council to reverse or improve upon that decision.
1:40:48 PM
JUSTIN DAHL, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council,
testified as appointee to the Alaska Police Standards Council.
He said he has been serving with the Anchorage Police Department
for the last 25 years, currently as chief of police, and has
been serving on the Alaska Police Standards Council for the last
three to four years.
CHAIR CLAMAN noted that Mr. Dahl would be retiring from his
position as chief of police with APD and had applied for
"similar positions in other locales." He asked Mr. Dahl how his
retirement and subsequent work either in Alaska or Outside would
affect his ability to serve on the council.
MR. DAHL stated, "When my retirement takes effect, even if I
were willing to continue to serve and remain an Alaska resident,
it would need to pass on to another chief of police." He said
he spoke with the Office of the Governor about this when he
announced his retirement and was asked to continue with the
appointment process. He said he is currently chair of the
council and would continue to serve in that role until he
retires and is no longer eligible. In response to Chair Claman,
he confirmed that, if confirmed, his appointed term on the
council would end June 30, [2021], and if he is hired as chief
of police somewhere else within Alaska, he would not need to
retire from the council.
1:42:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked Mr. Dahl to comment on how to
improve recruitment in law enforcement.
MR. DAHL answered that "we" need to continue doing what has been
done, and he emphasized the importance of "getting the word
out." He said he thinks [recruitment] is challenging because
currently law enforcement is under a lot of scrutiny nationwide,
which can make it challenging to convince young people to choose
it as a career field. He said APD has had a lot of success,
with staff "bumped up" to 100 percent for the academy. He
indicated that outreach, education, and encouragement are key.
1:44:13 PM
ED MERCER, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council, testified
as appointee to the Alaska Police Standards Council. He said he
has worked in law enforcement for approximately 28 years and is
currently the chief of police in the Juneau Police Department
(JPD). He noted other experience as listed on his resume [in
the committee packet], including an FBI Academy graduate and
service on several boards. He estimated he has served on the
council for at least a year and a half. He said he serves on
the FBI Criminal Justice Information System Northwest Group and
is a member of the High Intensity Drug Trafficking (HIDA) Board.
1:46:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked about a three-year bar to making a
transition from military law enforcement to civilian law
enforcement, and asked Mr. Mercer for his thoughts or ideas for
change in that regard.
MR. MERCER echoed Chief Dahl's remark that this is a tough time
for recruitment and retention of personnel. He said APD has
several members who transferred from military to civilian law
enforcement. He said APD encourages all who are interested in
law enforcement. Currently APD participates with the National
Guard and U.S. Army to get current military members interested
in law enforcement and direct them to those agencies open to
accepting applicants with a military background. He expressed
the need to "take a broad approach" and said, "I'm open to
that."
1:48:17 PM
JENNIFER WINKLEMAN, Appointee, Alaska Police Standards Council,
shared her biographical and educational information as shown on
her resume [in the committee packet], including that she has
worked with the Department of Corrections (DOC) for just over 20
years, with current service as the director of Pretrial
Probation and Parole. She said she considers it a privilege to
be given the opportunity to serve on the council, and she said
her work has helped her recognize the challenges endured by
Alaska law enforcement. She said being on the council allows
her a voice to ensure best practices in certification and
training are being followed, as well as affording her the
opportunity to try to restore lost faith in law enforcement
resulting from cases of misconduct. She said she has served on
the council for a little over two years and feels her experience
and personality continue to be an asset to the council. She
said she has been fair and impartial in making decisions that
impact officers and communities.
1:50:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN brought up the topic of reserve police
officers and mentioned a limitation in recruitment, and he asked
Ms. Winkleman whether she had any comments on the topic based on
her experience on the council.
MS. WINKLEMAN answered that she does not, but said her curiosity
has been peaked to look into the topic.
1:52:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS expressed his appreciation of Ms.
Winkleman's service within DOC, and he opined that the state
would be well represented with her on the council.
1:52:43 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on the confirmation hearing
on the governor's appointees to the Alaska Police Standards
Council. There being no one who wished to testify, he closed
public testimony.
CHAIR CLAMAN invited final comments from the committee.
1:53:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND remarked that Mr. Dahl will be missed in
Anchorage. She said it is frustrating that the governor has not
instead appointed someone who is not retiring in a few months,
but she said she knows Mr. Dahl will serve well in the brief
time he is on the council.
1:54:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed appreciation for each of the
appointees willing to serve on the council and asked them to
focus on recruitment and retention.
1:54:23 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN acknowledged the work some of the appointees had
done while serving previous terms.
1:54:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER stated that the House Judiciary Standing
Committee has reviewed the qualifications of the governor's
appointees and recommends that the following names be forwarded
to a joint session for consideration: Gregory "Scott" Campbell,
Justin Dahl, Ed Mercer, and Jennifer Winkleman to the Alaska
Police Standards Council. She said this does not reflect any
intent by any of the members to vote for or against these
individuals during further sessions for the purposes of
confirmation.
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the names of Gregory "Scott"
Campbell, Justin Dahl, Ed Mercer, and Jennifer Winkleman,
appointees to the Alaska Police Standards Council, would be
forwarded to the joint session.
^CONFIRMATION HEARING(S)
CONFIRMATION HEARING(S)
^SELECT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE ETHICS
SELECT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE ETHICS
1:55:45 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the next order of business would be
the confirmation hearing on the governor's appointees to the
Select Committee on Legislative Ethics.
1:56:30 PM
DENNIS "SKIP" COOK, Appointee, Select Committee on Legislative
Ethics, gave his biographical experience, as noted on the resume
[included in the committee packet], including 43 years
practicing law before his retirement in 1970. During that time
he was appointed to the Select Committee on Legislative Ethics
by Chief Justice Matthews. He said he enjoyed training and
advisory work and has participated in suggesting legislative
changes. He remarked that in the 27 years he has served on the
committee, there has been considerable turnover, and he
expressed the value of having some continuity. He asked that he
be allowed to continue this service.
1:58:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN offered his understanding that Mr. Cook
had not confirmed last year, and he inquired whether there is
any limitation on members of the Select Committee on Legislative
Ethics being put forward by the courts.
CHAIR CLAMAN noted Representative Eastman was asking a legal
question and gave Mr. Cook the leeway to answer if he was
comfortable doing so.
MR. COOK responded that he does not believe he was on the
schedule for confirmation last year or that he has ever not been
confirmed. He said he does not think there is a limitation
regarding someone coming back on the committee if he/she had not
been confirmed.
1:59:41 PM
GERALD "JERRY" MACBETH, Appointee, Select Committee on
Legislative Ethics, gave his resume information [in the
committee packet], sharing his background in Political Science,
his study of Alaska politics, and his former work as a teacher.
He called himself "the veteran political scientist in the state
of Alaska." He noted he had developed an Ethics course as part
of University of Alaska's core curriculum and taught the course
for 25 years. He emphasized his belief in the legislature as
the heart of democratic governance. He said people's trust in
legislatures is essential and has been declining overall. He
said the Select Committee on Legislative Ethics ensures the
public knows the legislature is doing business in an ethical
manner. He said he wants to reinforce the public's faith in
democratic institutions and has the time to do that now that he
is no longer teaching. He said he applied because he thinks he
has something to add that other public members of the committee
may not have. Further, he said he may learn a great deal.
2:03:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked Mr. Macbeth how he will go about
improving the public's trust.
MR. MACBETH answered that is one of the purposes of AS 24.60,
which is the Act establishing the Select Committee on
Legislative Ethics. The statute allows anyone to submit
complaints to the committee about operations of the legislature
and legislative members that any individual believes are
wrongful and unethical. He pointed out that unlike the
executive and judicial branch ethics, in the legislative branch
there is "the problem of focusing attention on a legislative
complaint while having, as legislatures to work with, a member
of the legislative body who is under a cloud." He noted that
the Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) as an increasingly
rigorous disclosure requirement, which he said has to be
considered in connection with legislative ethics. In response
to a follow-up question, he described his work with former
Senator Frank Murkowski.
2:08:32 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN offered clarification on the subject of term
lengths.
2:09:48 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN [opened public testimony on the confirmation
hearings for the governor's appointees to the Select Committee
on Legislative Ethics.] There being no one who wished to
testify, he closed public testimony.
CHAIR CLAMAN invited final comments from the committee.
2:10:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN thanked the appointees and asked them to
keep in mind his understanding that there is a lot about the
Select Committee on Legislative Ethics that legislators "aren't
necessarily familiar with."
2:11:02 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN thanked both appointees for their service and for
the work Mr. Macbeth has done in the review of the work of the
legislature in Alaska and other states.
2:11:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER stated that the House Judiciary Standing
Committee has reviewed the qualifications of the governor's
appointees and recommends that the following names be forwarded
to a joint session for consideration: Dennis "Skip" Cook and
Gerald "Jerry" Macbeth to the Select Committee on Legislative
Ethics. She said this does not reflect any intent by any of the
members to vote for or against the individuals during further
sessions for the purposes of confirmation.
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the names of Dennis "Skip" Cook and
Gerald "Jerry" Macbeth, appointees to the Select Committee on
Legislative Ethics would be forwarded to the [joint session for
confirmation].
2:12:18 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 2:12 p.m. to 2:16 p.m.
HB 3-DEFINITION OF "DISASTER": CYBERSECURITY
2:16:20 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 3, "An Act relating to the definition of
'disaster.'" [Before the committee was CSHB 3(STA).]
2:17:17 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN passed the gavel to Vice Chair Snyder [who
transitioned from Teams video participation to in-room presence
during this part of the meeting].
2:17:28 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN moved to adopt Amendment 1 to CSHB 3(STA), labeled
32-LS0041\G.5, Dunmire, 3/16/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 30, following "affected;":
Insert "in this subparagraph, "critical
infrastructure" means systems and assets, whether
physical or virtual, so vital to the state that the
incapacity or destruction of the systems and assets
would have a debilitating effect on security, state
economic security, state public health or safety, or
any combination of those matters;"
2:17:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND objected for the purpose of discussion.
CHAIR CLAMAN spoke to Amendment 1. He said it would add a
definition of critical infrastructure based on the federal
definition, changing the reference to the United States to "the
state".
2:18:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DELENA JOHNSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor of HB 3, said she is fine with Amendment 1.
2:18:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked for a definitions showing the
difference between "security" and "state economic security".
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN proffered that an example of security is
public security, such as a threat to the public safety database,
while a threat to the transportation of oil would be directly
related to economic security. In response to a follow-up
question, he said he thinks under the proposed legislation, the
governor would have the authority to declare an emergency if
there was a threat to the pipeline. To a further follow-up
regarding web sites, he said the answer depends on the specific
situation; a massive web site with a tremendous amount of use
that is getting threatened is different from a personal web
site. He said Amendment 1 "doesn't propose to provide that
level of definition."
2:22:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said she likes the effort to define
critical infrastructure in terms of cybersecurity; however, she
said all the lines in Amendment 1 that reference security,
economic security, and public health and safety may be limiting
what can be done. She suggested ending the sentence following
"have a debilitating effect". She expressed concern that there
may be things that would fall under that definition that are not
listed in Amendment 1.
2:24:36 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN responded that he would not support that change
because the definition in Amendment 1 is patterned on the
federal definition and he would like the two to align so that
the federal standard informs how the state standard is applied.
2:25:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed concern that making the
definition as broad as it is would authorize the declaration of
disaster for anything.
2:26:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted that Amendment 1 would amend
[paragraph (2), subparagraph] (F), [which is a subparagraph
added under CSHB 3(STA)]. She highlighted the following in
subparagraph (F):
(F) a cybersecurity attack that affects critical
infrastructure in the state, an information system
owned or operated by the state
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND opined that an information system
includes any web site and data storage. She gave the example of
"My Alaska," which includes not only the permanent fund dividend
(PFD) application process, but also public official financial
disclosures and campaign disclosures. She said she thinks
Amendment 1 strengthens the definition of cyber infrastructure
and "is fine as is."
2:28:15 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, in response to a question from Representative
Kurka, offered his view that Amendment 1 would affect only
[subparagraph] (F).
2:30:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND removed her objection to the motion to
adopt Amendment 1.
2:30:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.
2:30:35 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, Vance, and Claman voted in favor of the motion
to adopt Amendment 1. Representatives Eastman and Kurka voted
against it. Therefore, Amendment 1 was adopted by a vote of 5-
2.
VICE CHAIR SNYDER passed the gavel back to Chair Claman.
2:31:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 2, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.2, Marx/Dunmire, 3/16/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 1, following "to":
Insert "a declaration of a disaster emergency;
and relating to"
Page 1, following line 2:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Section 1. AS 26.23.020(c) is amended to read:
(c) If the governor finds that a disaster has
occurred or that a disaster is imminent or threatened,
the governor shall, by proclamation, declare a
condition of disaster emergency. The disaster
emergency remains in effect until the governor finds
that the danger has passed or the disaster has been
dealt with so that the emergency no longer exists. The
governor may terminate the disaster emergency by
proclamation. A proclamation of disaster emergency may
not remain in effect longer than 30 days unless
extended by a majority of the members of the
legislature in joint session [BY A CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION]. The proclamation must indicate the nature
of the disaster, the area threatened or affected, and
the conditions that have brought it about or that make
possible the termination of the disaster emergency. A
proclamation to declare a condition of disaster
emergency must also state whether the governor
proposes to expend state funds to respond to the
disaster under (i) or (j) of this section. Unless
authorized by a majority of the members of the
legislature in joint session,
(1) the governor may not declare a
condition of disaster emergency while a declared
condition of disaster emergency remains in effect; and
(2) the governor may not declare a
condition of disaster emergency related to a condition
of disaster emergency previously declared by that
governor.
* Sec. 2. AS 26.23.210(a) is amended to read:
(a) In the event of a conflict between this
chapter and AS 26.20, including in the event the
governor declares a disaster under this chapter due to
an attack or credible threat of imminent enemy or
terrorist attack [AS DESCRIBED IN AS 26.23.900(2)],
the provisions of this chapter shall govern."
Page 1, line 3:
Delete "Section 1"
Insert "Sec. 3"
Page 1, line 6:
Delete "resulting from"
Insert "[RESULTING FROM"
Page 1, line 7, through page 2, line 30:
Delete all material and insert:
"(A) AN INCIDENT SUCH AS STORM, HIGH WATER,
WIND-DRIVEN WATER, TIDAL WAVE, TSUNAMI, EARTHQUAKE,
VOLCANIC ERUPTION, LANDSLIDE, MUDSLIDE, AVALANCHE,
SNOWSTORM, PROLONGED EXTREME COLD, DROUGHT, FIRE,
FLOOD, EPIDEMIC, EXPLOSION, OR RIOT;
(B) THE RELEASE OF OIL OR A HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE IF THE RELEASE REQUIRES PROMPT ACTION TO
AVERT ENVIRONMENTAL DANGER OR MITIGATE ENVIRONMENTAL
DAMAGE;
(C) EQUIPMENT FAILURE IF THE FAILURE IS NOT
A PREDICTABLY FREQUENT OR RECURRING EVENT OR
PREVENTABLE BY ADEQUATE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR
OPERATION;
(D) ENEMY OR TERRORIST ATTACK OR A CREDIBLE
THREAT OF IMMINENT ENEMY OR TERRORIST ATTACK IN OR
AGAINST THE STATE THAT THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS OR A
DESIGNEE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, IN CONSULTATION WITH
THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY OR A DESIGNEE OF THE
COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CERTIFIES TO THE
GOVERNOR HAS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING IN THE
NEAR FUTURE; THE CERTIFICATION MUST MEET THE STANDARDS
OF AS 26.20.040(C); IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, "ATTACK" HAS
THE MEANING GIVEN UNDER AS 26.20.200; OR
(E) AN OUTBREAK OF DISEASE OR A CREDIBLE
THREAT OF AN IMMINENT OUTBREAK OF DISEASE THAT THE
COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES OR A
DESIGNEE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL
SERVICES CERTIFIES TO THE GOVERNOR HAS A HIGH
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING IN THE NEAR FUTURE; THE
CERTIFICATION MUST BE BASED ON SPECIFIC INFORMATION
RECEIVED FROM A LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, OR
INTERNATIONAL AGENCY, OR ANOTHER SOURCE THAT THE
COMMISSIONER OR THE DESIGNEE DETERMINES IS RELIABLE];"
2:31:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 2. He said it would
remove all the reasons for the damage and focus instead on there
being damage; therefore, any widespread damage would qualify as
a disaster. Further, he said Amendment 2 would prevent there
being two disasters declared when the legislature had not
addressed the first one.
2:34:33 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN observed that Amendment 2 would require a title
change to the purpose of the bill. Further, he stated that the
proposed amendment would delve into "a whole new area about
declarations of disaster," which he said has never been the
subject of the proposed legislation. Therefore, he ruled
Amendment 2 out of order.
2:34:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE objected. She observed that Amendment 2
applies to Section 1 of CSHB 3(STA); therefore, she questioned
how it would be out of order.
CHAIR CLAMAN explained that part of Amendment 2 proposes a new
section not part of AS 26.23.900; it goes into AS 26.23.020,
which addresses the declaration itself as opposed to the
cybersecurity issue. He said, "This is the sort of thing we
should spend a lot more time reviewing than taking it up as an
amendment to an existing bill."
2:35:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked if it was Chair Claman's intention
to rule all amendments that change the bill title out of order.
CHAIR CLAMAN said this is not a blanket rule. He explained that
under Rule 1 in Mason's Manual, the committee is allowed to
control the debate and "not spend excessive time on things that
aren't really relevant to the matter at hand." He suggested
Representative Eastman's proper venue is to introduce a bill
taking up these issues.
2:36:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.
2:36:53 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of the ruling of the
chair on Amendment 2. Representatives Vance, Eastman, and Kurka
voted against it. Therefore, the ruling of the chair was upheld
by a vote of 4-3.
2:37:57 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN ruled Amendment 3, [included in the committee
packet but never moved for adoption] out of order. He said it
brings up the subject of martial law, which had not been
discussed previously, and which he opined is well beyond the
bounds of what the committee would be discussing today.
2:38:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether Amendment 3 had been
"entered into the record."
CHAIR CLAMAN offered his understanding that Amendment 3 had been
entered into the record, since it was "circulated on [the Bill
Action & Status Inquiry System] (BASIS)."
2:38:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected to the ruling of the chair. He
said CSHB 3(STA) deals with disaster emergencies, and he opined
there is confusion on at what point an emergency becomes martial
law.
2:39:07 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of upholding the
ruling of the chair on Amendment 3. Representatives Kurka,
Vance, and Eastman voted against it. Therefore, the ruling of
the chair was upheld by a vote of 4-3.
2:39:50 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN ruled Amendment 4, [in the committee packet but
never moved for adoption], out of order.
2:39:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected and spoke to his objection. He
indicated the Chair Claman, through his ruling, was denying his
constituents their right to speak through the committee process.
CHAIR CLAMAN welcomed a bill from Representative Eastman
addressing these issues. He maintained that he thinks
[Amendment 4] would not be a wise use of the committee's time;
therefore, he said he would not change his ruling.
2:40:40 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of the ruling of the
chair on Amendment 4. Representatives Eastman, Kurka, and Vance
voted against it. Therefore, by a vote of 4-3, the ruling of
the chair was upheld.
2:41:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 5, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.6, Dunmire, 3/17/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 17:
Delete "cybersecurity"
Insert "cyber"
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "cybersecurity attack or cybersecurity"
Insert "cyber attack or cyber"
2:41:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS objected.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 5. He recalled there
had been testimony supporting a broader scope to include all
cyber incidents and events, not just those where someone is
"going through the guard tower and causing the damage or
injury." He said he does not have a position on [Amendment 5],
but he explained that "it does seem to clarify the intent of the
sponsor." In response to a question from Chair Claman, he
clarified that he is offering Amendment 5 for the benefit of the
committee, not for his constituents.
2:42:44 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN noted Mark Breunig, an information security
officer, was available for questions.
2:43:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked to hear Mark Breunig's thoughts on
Amendment 5.
2:43:26 PM
MARK BREUNIG, Chief Information Security Officer, State Security
Office, Department of Administration, said he does not have an
issue with the change proposed under Amendment 5. He said he
thinks the intent of [CSHB 3(STA)] would be maintained.
2:43:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS removed his objection. There
being no further objection, Amendment 5 was [adopted].
2:44:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 6, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.7, Dunmire, 3/17/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "vulnerability"
Insert "event"
2:44:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 6. He said the reason
is that the bill sponsor had said that "event" was what was
originally intended. He said he was offering the amendment but
taking no position on it. In response to a question from Chair
Claman, he explained the reason he had not combined Amendments 5
and 6 was for the purpose of clarity.
2:45:10 PM
MR. BREUNIG, in response to Chair Claman, said he thinks
"vulnerability" speaks to potential outcomes. He said "event"
is broader but does not damage "the integrity and intent of this
change."
2:45:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON, in response to Chair Claman, said she is
fine with Amendment 6 because she does not think it changes the
outcome of CSHB 3(STA).
2:46:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER removed her objection to Amendment 6.
There being no further objection, Amendment 6 was [adopted].
CHAIR CLAMAN invited final comments on CSHB 3(STA), as amended.
2:46:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND commented that her prior concern
regarding political subdivisions of the state had been
addressed, and they would be protected under CSHB 3(STA), as
amended.
2:47:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE expressed thanks to the bill sponsor for
bringing the proposed legislation forward to provide "more
opportunities to protect our systems in the future."
2:47:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed appreciation for the proposed
bill and said he would not object to its moving forward, but he
said he has concerns with the direction it takes the state,
since it would broaden the degree to which a disaster can be
declared during a time in which "we are declaring an awful lot
more disasters than we have in the past." He opined, "... if
we're going to continue to declare these disasters going
forward, I think that points to the need for some substantive
changes in our laws, so we don't have to get around the laws by
declaring the disasters as frequently as we do."
2:48:31 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN said he appreciates the sponsor's legislation,
since it addresses concerns that have arisen since the state has
experienced cybersecurity issues and attacks in the last few
years in Alaska, and he appreciates the sponsor working with his
office on the definition of critical infrastructure. He further
expressed appreciation for the amendments brought by
Representative Eastman that offered clarity on cyber versus
cybersecurity. For those reasons, he said, he encouraged
support of CSHB 3(STA), as amended.
2:49:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to report CSHB 3(STA), as amended,
out of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB
3(JUD) was reported out of the House Judiciary Standing
Committee.
[REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER returned to her office to participate
during the final portion of the meeting via Teams.]
HB 57-FUNDS SUBJECT TO CBR SWEEP PROVISION
2:50:36 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 57, "An Act relating to the budget reserve fund
established under art. IX, sec. 17(d), Constitution of the State
of Alaska; relating to money available for appropriation for
purposes of applying art. IX, sec. 17, Constitution of the State
of Alaska; and providing for an effective date."
2:51:00 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 2:51 p.m. to 2:52 p.m.
2:52:15 PM
ELISE THORNBERG, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson, Alaska
State Legislature, presented the sectional analysis for HB 57 on
behalf of Representative Josephson, prime sponsor. The
sectional analysis read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1: Outlines legislative intent and findings.
This section expounds on the principles outlined in
the Alaska Supreme Court ruling Hickel v Cowper as to
how the constitutional budget reserve (CBR) sweep
provision should be interpreted and also summarizes
the historic disagreement between different
governmental branches and agencies about the
interpretation of the sweep provision. In short, this
section outlines the logic behind and legal need for
this bill.
Section 2: Repeals and reenacts AS 37.10.420 (a). This
section updates the statutory definitions on "the
amount available for appropriation," "funds available
for appropriation," and "amount appropriated for the
previous fiscal year" to align with the principles
outlined in Hickel v Cowper. Funds "available for
appropriation" in these definitions are those that are
immediately usable and over which the legislature has
retained appropriation authority. Additionally, the
actual amounts of appropriations of trust receipts
(such as federal funds) and certain monies explicitly
appropriated for fund administration are included in
the calculation of "available for appropriation".
Monies not considered "available for appropriation"
are: illiquid assets, funds already validly
appropriated by the legislature or funds that do not
require further appropriation prior to expenditure.
Section 3: Codifies a list of the funds already
determined by Legislative Finance to not be subject to
the CBR sweep.
Section 4: Creates a new section, AS 37.10.420(c),
that defines "general fund" and outlines fund types
explicitly not considered to be part of the general
fund. The general fund, as defined in this section, is
the state's main operating fund and is composed of all
money the state receives not legally required to be
held separately. Funds excluded from the general fund
include: funds held by the University or state
corporations, enterprise funds, debt service funds,
special revenue funds, the permanent fund, agency
funds and certain internal service funds.
Section 5: Provides an effective date of Jun 30, 2021
to ensure that this legislation would be in effect
prior to the FY 2021 CBR sweep occurring.
2:55:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, presented HB 57. He said the catalyst for HB 57
occurred June 13, 2019, when the legislature adjourned before
getting a "reverse sweep" - making the accounts vulnerable - and
before doing a capital budget; therefore, the legislature knew
it would have to return. He relayed that on June 28, 2019,
Governor Mike Dunleavy issued "the largest vetoes in Alaska
history" - totaling $440 million. Then came the dispute on
whether the legislature would meet in Wasilla or Juneau. The
legislature came to Juneau that summer to finish its work.
Because it had not had the reverse sweep by 11:59 p.m. on June
30, 2019, all the accounts were swept into the capital budget
reserve (CBR). He offered his understanding that the general
fund (GF) was swept into the CBR. He spoke of a general fund
within the GF. He said on July 19, 2019, hearings were held in
Senate Finance to discuss what was "swept" and what should have
been swept. He offered his understanding that in 26 years there
has not been "a real effort to do the thing the court and the
law allows us to do."
2:58:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON explained that in 1994, the legislature
laid out the rules as to how the sweep would work, "to sort out
what was meant by this new constitutional provision." He stated
that the court, in Hickel v. Cowper, told the legislature it got
it "mostly" wrong, but invited the legislature "to take another
stab at it," with guideposts provided by the court. The
Constitution of the State of Alaska allows [the legislature] to
explain what is meant by the CBR. He said he wanted "to write a
bill that required us to do what the [Alaska] Supreme Court
said," but no more than that. He remarked on the suffering and
anxiety "that came from sweeping everything away" and on the
administration, which appeared to be saying that everything is
sweepable. He indicated that the administration wanted all the
funds to compete, and he said in most cases they do; however,
there is a presumption that those funds will be used as
designated.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said the language in the early part of
HB 57 is unique and helpful; it is the uncodified language that
he and Ms. Thornberg, with the aid of Megan Wallace in
Legislative Legal Services, drafted to express to those reading
it what the Alaska Supreme Court said. He said he found that a
lot, but not all, has to be swept. He noted involvement by the
Division of Legislative Finance and the Division of Legislative
Audit. He said there can be a road map to outline those things
that cannot be swept because "to sweep them would violate trust
principles" or terminate or "threaten a revolving loan fund."
He said all this information is in Hickel v. Cowper.
3:02:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said uncodified language shows there
are funds for which no further appropriation is needed, and
agencies can spend them as needed. He gave the example of spill
prevention response, a fund available for something that could
happen, such as the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill of March 1989. He
said there are revolving loan funds that require there always be
funds available. He said there are discussions in Hickel v.
Cowper about trust principles, where logically no one would
spend the entire funds, and the only amount that would be
available for appropriation is a reasonable sum that may be
appropriated every year, while the rest remains capitalized and
acts as "the mini corpus for that account." The court said it
did not want to disrupt the basic fiscal principles or funding
sources that are used traditionally. He stated, "Remarkably,
Hickel v. Cowper, while it certainly says something is going to
go in the CBR, it's not all of it." Representative Josephson
concluded by invited the committee "to read and re-read the
uncodified language."
3:04:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN announced that HB 57 was held over.
3:05:49 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Judiciary Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 3:06 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Gregory Campbell Application 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Justin Doll Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Ed Mercer Application 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Jennifer Winkelman Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics Appointment - Dennis Skip Cook Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics Appointment - Gerald Jerry McBeath Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| HB 3 v. G 3.8.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Sponsor Statement 2.18.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Legal Memo 2.10.2020.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - Alaska Health Department Reports Data Breach The Seattle Times 6.28.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - DHSS Cyber Attack Impacts More Than 100,000 Alaska Households 1.23.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - How One Alaskan Borough Survived A Cyber Attack CitiesSpeak 10.1.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - MSBD Press Release Mat-Su Declares Disaster for Cyber Attack 7.31.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - Pipeline Article Alaska Public Media 3.14.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - CISA Critical Infrastructure 2.23.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Fiscal Note DOA-OIT 2.21.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 v. G Amendments #1-6 HJUD 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 v. G Amendments #1-6 HJUD Final Votes 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 57 v. B 2.18.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Sponsor Statement 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Sectional Analysis v. B 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - OMB Letter 7.12.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - CBR Sweep Breakdown by Fund - LFD March 2020 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - AEA Memo on PCE Sweep 8.24.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Hickel v. Cowper May 27, 1994 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Legislative Finance Outline of AS 37.10.420 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Legislative Research Memo GF Definitions 9.1.2020.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - FY19 Single Audit - Finding No. 2019-089 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - FY20 CAFR General Fund Accounts 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact 3.6.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 PowerPoint Presentation 3.10.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 3 Testimony - Received as of 2.22.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |